Gregor And Grete Sams Stuck Of Gender Roles - 1620 Words

Gregor and Grete Samsa: Stuck in Gender Roles The narration â€Å"Metamorphosis† by Franz Kafka, when examined through the feminist lens, shows society’s confining expectations towards both sexes in which conformity to the patriarchal structure is inescapable. The modern feminist movement created a need for inquiry into feminist issues; thus, as Gardner et al. outlined the objectives of feminist criticism, an unnatural confinement by a patriarchal society of both genders into preconceived roles becomes exposed (1269). The protagonist, Gregor Samsa, becomes a frightening example of what might happen to somebody who fails to adapt to this strict arrangement, while his sister Grete seizes the chance to empower herself within the narrow confines of her family, which mirror the rules of society. Her brother, unable to cope, ends up cornered and dehumanized as a complete â€Å"misfit† in the eyes of society. For a short while, at her brother’s expense, Grete develops and thrives, but her future is foreshado wed. She will subsequently adhere to society’s expectations, get married, and follow the typical life cycle of a patronized female. Franz Kafka’s â€Å"Metamorphosis,† then, allows the critical reader of feminist issues valuable insight to the workings of patriarchal oppression and gender stereotypes by presenting the affected characters’ actions and attitudes. The structure of the Samsa family is definitely patriarchal in style which means that Gregor’s father, as the oldest male of the

Monarchy Free Essays

Such political system is called Monarchy. In political science, monarchy is a form of government, in which a ruler (a king, an emperor, a sultan, etc.) has the highest power to rule the country solely. We will write a custom essay sample on Monarchy or any similar topic only for you Order Now Usually such rulers inherit their right to be in power, as well as the right to remain in office for life. Monarchy is arguably the oldest form of government, which takes source from hereditary leadership in ancient tribal communities. Historically, monarchy was more focused and effective form of government than aristocracy and democracy. There are several types of monarchy. Absolute monarchy is the form of government which can be characterized by almost unlimited power of the ruler, including the right to change or withdraw the constitution. Â  Constitutional monarchy is a type of monarchy, in which the power of the ruler is bounded by constitution, country’s parliament is the legislature, and government is the executive. Also, there are parliamentary monarchy, dualistic monarchy, elective monarchy, and theocratic monarchy. The most known examples of monarchy are the dynasties of French and Russian Kings (the 9th – 19th centuries), as well as the members of the British Royal Family. Lately, such form of government as democracy prevails on global level, leaving only symbolic functions to the institution of monarchy. Nevertheless, there are still fully functional monarchies in such countries as Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Brunei, etc. Other known constitutional monarchies include Great Britain, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Thailand, Japan and many others. How to cite Monarchy, Essay examples

James madison Essay Example For Students

James madison Essay James Madison begins his famous federalist paper by explaining that the purpose of this essay is to help the readers understand how the structure of the proposed government makes liberty possible. Each branch should be, for the most part, in Madisons opinion, independent. To assure such independence, no one branch should have too much power in selecting members of the other two branches. If this principle were strictly followed, it would mean that the citizens should select the president, the legislators, and the judges. But, the framers recognized certain practical difficulties in making every office elective. In particular, the judicial branch would suffer because the average person is not aware of the qualifications judges should possess. Judges should have great ability, but also be free of political pressures. Since federal judges are appointed for life, their thinking will not be influenced by the president who appoints them, or the senators whose consent the president will see k. Madison furthers, the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches in the determination of their salaries. The best security against a gradual concentration of power in any one branch is to provide constitutional safeguards that would make such concentration difficult. The constitutional rights of all must check one mans personal interests and ambitions. We may not like to admit that men abuse power, but the very need for government itself proves they do, if men were angels, no government would be necessary. Unfortunately, all men are imperfect, the rulers and the ruled. Consequently, the great problem in framing a government is that the government must be able to control the people, but equally important, must be forced to control itself. The dependence of the government on the will of the people is undoubtedly the best control, but experience teaches that other controls are necessary. Dividing power helps to check its growth in any one direction, but power cannot be divided absolutely equally. In the republican form of government, the legislative branch tends to be the most powerful. That is why the framers divided the Congress into two branches, the House of Representatives and the Senate, and provided for a different method of election in each branch. Further safeguards against legislative tyranny may be necessary. In a representative democracy it is not only important to guard against the oppression of rulers, it is equally important to guard against the injustice which may be inflicted by certain citizens or groups. Majorities often threaten the rights of minorities. There are only two methods of avoiding evil. The first is to construct a powerful government, a community will. Such a will is larger than, and independent of, the simply majority. This solution is dangerous because such a government might throw its power behind a group in society working against the public good. In our country, the authority to govern comes from the entire society the people. In addition, under the Constitution society is divided into many groups of people who hold different views and have different interests. This makes it very difficult for one group to dominate or threaten the minority groups. Justice is the purpose of government and civil society. If government allows or encourages strong groups to combine together against the weak, liberty will be lost and anarchy will result. And the condition of anarchy tempts even strong individuals and groups to submit to any form of government, no matter how bad, which they hope will protect them as well as the weak. Madison concludes that self-government flourishes in a large country containing many different groups. Some countries are too large for self-government, but the proposed plan modifies the federal principle enough to make self-government both possible and practical in the Untied States. Analysis:In this essay, Madisons thoughts on factionalism are delineated clearly. As we observed earlier, he assumed that conflicts of interests are inherent in human nature, and he recognized that, as a consequence, people fall into various groups. He wanted to avoid a situation in which any one group controlled the decisions of a society. Free elections and the majority principle protected the country from dictatorship, that is, the tyranny of a minority. However, he was equally concerned about the danger that he thought was more likely in a democracy, that is, the tyranny of the majority. A central institutional issue for him was how to minimize this risk. Madisons solution characteristically relied not only on formal institutions, which could be designed, but also on the particular sociological structure of American society, which he took as a fortunate starting point for the framers of the new constitution. The institutional component in his solution was checks and balances, so that there were multiple entry points into the government an d multiple ways to offset the power that any one branch of the government might otherwise acquire over another. In this system, the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that each may be a check on each other. These institutional arrangements were reinforced by the sociological fact that the Republic contained a multiplicity of interests that could, and did, offset one another: While all authority in it will be derived from and dependent on the society, the society itself will be broken into so many parts, interests and classes of citizens that the rights of individuals, or of the minority, will be in little danger form interested combinations of the majority. It is good that there are many group interests; that they be numerous is less important than that they be impermanent and shifting alliances whose components vary with the specific policy issue. Madison commenced the statement of his theory in Federalist 51 with an acknowledgement that t he have nots in any society are extremely likely to attack the haves, for like Hamilton the Virginian believed class struggle to be inseparable from politics. It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard against the oppression of its rulers, Madison writes, but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other. Different interests necessarily exist in different classes of citizens. If a majority be united by a common interest the rights of the minority will be secure. Madison, it is clear, had emancipated himself from the sterile dualistic view of society that was so common in the eighteenth century and that so obsessed Hamilton. Madison was one of the pioneers of pluralism in political thought. Where Hamilton saw the corporate spirit of the several states as poisonous to the union, Madison was aware that the preservation of the state governments could serve the cause of both liberty and union. Finally, the vastness of the United States, a fact that Ha milton considered the prime excuse for autocracy was recognized by Madison as the surest preservative of liberty. To assert after reading this passage that Alexander Hamilton wrote Federalist 51 is to imply first, that he was a magician in mimicking Madisons very words and tone of vote, and in the second place that he was the most disingenuous hypocrite that ever wrote on politics. No unprejudiced or informed historian would accept this latter charge against Hamilton. It is interesting to note that the Federalist papers are unique, as shown in this paper, because of the extreme amount of thought that was put into the design of the constitution, as shown in Madisons original thought process that were penned in 51. Many, if not most, changes in institutional design, they usually occur as the reactions of shortsighted people to what they perceive as more-or-less short-range needs. This is one reason the Constitutional Convention was a remarkable event. The Founding Fathers set out deli berately to design the form of government that would be most likely to bring about the long-range goals that they envisaged for the Republic. What is most unusual about Madison, in contrast to the other delegates, is the degree to which he thought about the principles behind the institutions he preferred. Not only did he practice the art of what nowadays is deemed institutional design, but he developed, as well, the outlines of a theory of institutional design that culminated in this essay. Federalists 51Supports: Partition of powersEach DepartmentShould have a will of its ownThus members of each should have little to do with appointments of members of the otherMember of each should be as little dependent as possible of the others for the emoluments annexed to their offices. .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 , .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .postImageUrl , .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 , .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661:hover , .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661:visited , .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661:active { border:0!important; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661:active , .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661 .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u9020259633cd9f03cd6f006dbd267661:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: J.R.R. Tolkien Research Paper Essay In framing a government1.government needs to control the governed2.government needs to control itselfEach department should have different amounts of self-defense because some departments need it more than others. Ex. Repersentative government legislative huge divided into subgroups. Two considerations:Single All the power surrendered by the people is submitted to the administration of a single government. Compound power first divided by two distinct governments and then each portion subdivided among separate departments. Guard society not only of oppression of its rulers, but also injustice of the other part. Need to guard minorities. Keeps people from just electing someone on a whim. Words/ Pages : 1,517 / 24

Philosophy and Heraclitus Essay Example

Philosophy and Heraclitus Paper Ancient Greek philosopher: Heraclitus Heraclitus was born in Ephesus. He belonged to an aristocratic family but refused to have a political life. His writing style is unusual, in that many of the surviving fragments are written in short and often cryptic phrases. He was known as the weeping philosopher. He was also referred to as the riddler or the obscure one, due to the puzzling nature of his writings, as well as the mocker or the reviler of the mob, due to his dislike for those who were not open-minded. Heraclitus has a huge contempt for humanity and politics. Therefore, towards the end of his life he left the city and went to live in isolation in the mountains in which he fed on plants and herbs. This caused him to contract dropsy which forced him to return to the city for treatment. He asked the doctors in a riddling way if they could change a rainstorm into a draught. When they failed to understand him, he buried himself in a byre, thinking that the dropsy would be vaporized by the heat of the dung. His attempt was not successful and he died at the age of sixty Heraclitus did not belong to a school of thought. We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy and Heraclitus specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy and Heraclitus specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy and Heraclitus specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer He had independent thinking and actually criticized many philosophers. He developed many important philosophical ideas that are still admired today. Among his most important ideas are flux and Unity of opposites. Heraclitus is called a monist (because he believes fire is the underlying principle) and an elitist (he believes most people are stupid). Heraclitus is said to have influenced Parmenides, Empedocles, Democritus, Plato, and the Stoics. Heraclitus said: You cannot step into the same river twice, for fresh waters are ever flowing in upon you. This statement is the essence of the concept of flux as it means that the river is always different every time you step into it. He looked at everything being in the state of change and that only change is permanent. He told people that nothing is the same now as it was before, and thus nothing what is now will be the same tomorrow. With this he planted the idea of impermanence into Greek thought, and indeed, after Heraclitus Greek philoso phy was not the same anymore. (Thomas K. ). Another influential idea is the unity of opposites. Heraclitus believed that opposites are the same and cannot exist without each other. He thought that opposites are identical. For instance, to Heraclitus, hot and cold are the same. Heraclitus saw unity as being harmony. To modern people, it seems silly to assume that opposites are identical but to the Greek, it completely makes sense. Hot and cold can both be expressed as a level of temperature, dark and bright as a degree of light. This is why opposites cannot exist without each other because when you say something is hot, it should be hot in comparison with something colder. The ideas of flux and unity of opposites are somehow connected to each other. It is sometimes argued that Heraclitus quote: You cannot step into the same river twice, for fresh waters are ever flowing in upon you. Is actually referring to the unity of opposites because the river is the same but at the same time it is different because new fresh waters flow on it. To conclude, Heraclitus was a very independent thinker and a huge critic of everything around him. His puzzling writings and deviant thoughts made him popular and influential among the later philosophers. His ideas of flux and the unity of opposites are still admired by todays philosophers. Unfortunately, not all his writings survived the years and only fragments of his writings exist. As much as we write about Heraclitus and try to understand him, in the end Much learning does not teach understanding. References: 1. website name and author are unknown, http://home. wlu. edu/~mahonj/Ancient_Philosophers/Heraclitus. htm 2. Thomas Knierim, Heraclitus,http://www. thebigview. com/greeks/heraclitus. html, 3. N. S. Gill, About. com, http://ancienthistory. about. com/od/philosophers/g/Heraclitus. htm

Obesity Nutrition and Foods Essay

Obesity Nutrition and Foods Essay Obesity: Nutrition and Foods Essay Kristy Bryant-Berg Writing 122 November 4, 2013 Obesity: Who is Responsible? America is one of the most obese countries in the world, and this has continuously become worse over the past 30 years. Eating healthier and exercising frequently can decrease the percentage of obesity in America, but does everybody have that opportunity? Low-income areas are filled with families who need to find ways to support themselves with the least of money they can, so they purchase what’s cheap, and what’s cheap is junk food. Whether it’s junk food in the grocery store, or junk food through fast food industries, these unhealthy options are the only options for many families due to the in-prices when compared to healthier options. The origin of this problem can be explained through subsidies, and they also provide the solution. The government needs to subsidize healthier crops, and not so much crops involved in processed foods, because it would allow a more equal opportunity for purchasing healthier items. Once these healthy options are readily available a nd affordable for all Americans, they are given the responsibility of managing their own health. By changing what is subsidized, it would provide cheap but healthy options for those who previously couldn’t afford it, especially for those in low-income areas. Families located in these low-income areas are, in a way, forced into obesity. Fast food franchises aggressively target these cities (Critser 42), offering abundant meals for a fraction of the cost that a full meal at a grocery store would cost. This leaves heads of households with the choice of purchasing a small amount of healthy food and risking their families being hungry, or supplying their families with plentiful meals that has high risks of heart disease and diabetes. Fast food companies aren’t concerned with the effects of their product, they care about maximizing their profit, and these inner cities and their increasing need for cheap meals is what fuels the fast food industry (Critser 42). Much of what we subsidize now, such as corn and soybeans, is used in processed foods, including fast food. The Un ited States Department of Agriculture supports these subsidies, yet at the same time promotes healthy eating habits. What needs to happen is the government must â€Å"begin subsidies to those who produce and sell actual food for direct consumption† (Bittman). Ironically, consumer habits essentially control what is subsidized because the government subsidizes what is highest in demand. Americans seem to have developed a thirst for unhealthy food items over the past few decades. By giving into this thirst, they’ve inadvertently changed the ways of the food industry. The Farm Bill is what determines what foods and crops are to be subsidized, and it is determined by the demand of consumers in America. In her discussion of the Farm Bill, Alice Waters states, â€Å"Between 1985 and 2000, the price of sugary and high fat foods declined nearly 25 percent, while the cost of fruits and vegetables grew by almost 40 percent† (Waters 31). While this statistic is alarming, it is not surprising. She proceeded to explain â€Å"†¦the farm bill offers little, if any, support to the California farmers who produce nearly half of our nation’s fruits, nuts, and vegetables†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Waters 31). An immediate question to this stat ement is why aren’t these farmers receiving more support if they’re supplying a sizable amount of the nations fruits and vegetables? These farmers still have to make a living, so they must sell their products at a higher price to stores, and the stores then sell it at an even higher price in order for them to make a profit. It’s a vicious cycle, but can be fixed if we begin subsidizing these farmer’s healthier crops, rather than crops such as corn and soybeans. While corn and soybeans appear to be a type of healthier crop, it is the way they are used in the production of foods that promotes unhealthy eating habits. Mark Bittman stated in his

How to Complete a Personal Narrative Essay

How to Complete a Personal Narrative Essay How to Complete a Personal Narrative Essay In most of the cases, an assignment to write a personal narrative essay is quite challenging and students don’t know where to start. It is quite complicated, because you not only need to reveal your inner self but also remain honest and possess good writing skills. Remember that your narrative essay should always be written in a first person, using the past tense. Make yourself comfortable and continue reading to learn everything about a narrative essay! Choosing a topic When writing a narrative essay, you will need to describe and analyze a certain story from your personal experience. That is why it won’t be possible to use outside information or a research to decide which topic is the most suitable. Your story should be creative, interesting, simple and stirring up various emotions. That is why the best topic for a narrative essay is the one, which has dynamics, emotions and personal approach. Just take some time and think of the things you want to share with the world. You will definitely have an outstanding experience to share! Remain simple Many students are tempted to use complicated words and a huge vocabulary, not knowing that readers easily loose interest to such an essay. That is why it is better to use simple ideas, like starting with a quote or limiting the size of your sentences. Your vocabulary should be understandable and your language – readable. Don’t neglect the structure of your essay and it will definitely pay you back with great reviews and interest of the audience! Your story should match the task When you need to write a narrative essay, you start remembering tens of situations and stories you want to share with the world. However, it is important to choose a story, which will correspond with your assignment. Listen carefully to your tutor’s recommendations and select a topic, which gives answers to certain questions. For example: Â  How the situation helped you to change? Â  How did you overcome such a situation? Â  What did you learn from your mistakes? Every story provides a lesson and you are always welcome to share this lesson with the audience! Pay attention to details It is not enough to choose a story you want to share, as you also need to pay enough attention to its plot and structure. If you want to make your story smooth and interesting, try to answer following questions: Â  Where did your story start and where did it end? Â  What are the most important elements or characters of your story? Â  Who or what had an impact on the story? Â  What details you want to include to your text? We have also created a list of useful tips you may need, when completing a narrative essay: Â  Always stick to the point and never forget about the main aim of your story; Â  Follow a proper structure: your essay should have a beginning, a climax and conclusions; Â  Add emotions and colors to your text to engage the reader; Â  Make conclusions and mark the lessons you have learned; Â  Try to make your story short, not missing important details; Â  Your story shouldn’t be too formal if else is not indicated by your tutor; Â  It is useful to have both a protagonist and an antagonist in your text. Always revise your texts Many students neglect this important step, thinking that mistakes, both grammar and lexical ones, are not important and tutors will only evaluate the plot itself. However, such mistakes can greatly lower your grades, so you need to revise your text multiple times before the delivery. Make sure you have stated your story loud and clear, and provided every paragraph in an understandable manner. Every section should be readable and smooth, using academic language. In addition, you should also check your punctuation to make sure your sentences are understandable. Following all these tips will guarantee a great result and you will be able to provide an outstanding narrative essay for a minimum time!

Parkinson's Disease Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Parkinson's Disease - Term Paper Example Parkinsons disease is found all over the world and all different races. Parkinsons is the 4th leading cause of death for older adults and rising. The symptoms of Parkinsons disease are numerous. The first which is usually the "tip off" is shaking of a limb especially if the body is at rest. Other systems are sleep disturbances, slow movement, not being able to move, personality changes, rigid limbs, speech impairments, sexual difficulties, dementia, and depression. People with this disease usually walk with a shuffling gait, and a stooped posture. The severity of Parkinsons tends to worsen over time. There is no definite answer what causes Parkinsons but there are many theories. Many believe that it is a genetically inherited disease that is passed on from generation to generation. There are also connections with the illegal drug MPTP, and many of the people who get Parkinsons are people that got a server cause of influenza during an epidemic in the early 1900s. This disease might also because by chemicals or other types of pollution that were unaware of or that were unaware that were in feting are selves. Parkinsons disease has no confirmed date of when it was first found but researchers have documents of what they think is Parkinsons disease as far back as 3,000 BC. There is no definite cure for Parkinsons disease. Doctors usually prescribe levodopa which increases dopamine levels in the brain. In server cases some patients get brain surgery and implants have been done or used. A surgery which takes dopamine-producing tissue is transplanted into the brain is now being tested. If the surgery works it will prevent the dopamine-producing brain cells from dying. The 4 major symptoms of Parkinson’s disease are "Tremor" which is the rhythmic back and forth motion of the hands and fingers, "Rigidity" or a resistance to movement, in which there is a stiffness of the muscles. "Bradykinesia" (Brady-slow, kinesis-movement) or the slowing down and failure of